I’ve been a member of Dreamstime for a little over a year now, a place where you can find free stock photos for your blog, website or whatever your need for photos may be. The one thing you must know is that whether you go for the free photo or paid photo they are of the highest quality.
Whilst I have purchased photos from them on more than one occasion this site is more than a multitude of the best photos you will find on the net, it is also a place for members to upload their photos and once accepted these very same photos may be purchased by others. So you see it’s also a place for photographers, professionals and amateurs alike, to make money form their photography.
Unfortunately, whilst I only had my point and shoot camera the quality of it’s photos were not of a high enough standard. That however is a thing of the past because I’ve just purchased my very own Canon EOS 550D Digital SLR. Alas, like I said earlier Dreamstime only accept photos of the highest standards, so while my Canon is capable of 18MP photos, it seems that my photographic ability is somewhat lacking, but I don’t mind because every time I get rejected it’s forcing me to improve the quality of my shots.
I’ve learned a few things along the way and I know for a fact there is a lot more to learn. Take this photo for example.
I uploaded a series of photos of Adelaide by night which I took from across the River Torrens. Apparently that was the wrong thing to do, as was explained in an email.
As for the submission of the entire series – it is highly recommended that you do the selection yourself and only upload the best image of a series, provided that they are so similar. In the case of your series none of the images is acceptable and this is why one was refused with a more detailed explanation and the rest – for similarity. Your other images suffer either from the same problems or have very prominent
noise. At this point, given the problems with the images, you cannot resubmit either of them.
OK, so I bummed out. The email also went to say that the photos were ‘over filtered’ which I don’t understand because there wasn’t any filtering or editing of any of the pictures. They did suggest though that I take the photos at an earlier time so that there would be more light and not so many black areas. Oh well, I still like the photo.
Another thing you have to remember is not to upload any photos that have trademarks of any kind as these would also be rejected.
One thing I don’t understand about this mob is that when a photo is rejected they tell you what’s wrong with the photo so that you can fix the errors and resubmit it. So I took the photo again paying attention to what was required only to find out that it was rejected because I didn’t upload the same photo with the errors fixed? WTF? If they tell me that the composition was wrong or that the photo was out of focus how can I fix those errors without taking another photo.
Another thing that has me mystified is that on several occasions they’ve told me that my ‘white balance’ was incorrect. I don’t see how they can tell when they don’t know the actual color of the subject. Besides I’ve always left the auto white balance on, so does that mean that I shouldn’t use the auto white balance feature?
While frustrating I’m still going to persevere with them because I see it as being only a matter of time before my photography improves and I finally start making a bit of money from my hobby.
If you think your photos are of a good standard then perhaps you should consider joining Dreamstime so that you can make a bit of extra cash on the side.
The FlexSqueeze Theme gives my blog that professional look. I loved it so much that I bought the developers license. It's the easiest most customizable theme I've come across. See how easy it is to change your theme's appearance! Compare it to Thesis to see how much better it is! I am so thrilled with this theme that I highly recommend you to get your FlexSqueeze theme today! Like this post? Show your appreciation by buying me a coffee.
Filed under: Just Photos • Night Shots
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!



It’s stuff like this that I don’t fully understand about photography, Sire. I think your image is wonderful, but professionals don’t seem to like it; what the heck are they looking at? I have this thing I like to do with some images where I make them lighter so I can see more detail, yet I hear that some photographers think that stinks. Hey, we like what we like, right?
Mitch recently posted..Writing A Press Release
I always thought that unless you were trying to do something artistic or out of the ordinary you should leave the photo alone. I don’t have PhotoShop so I can’t manipulate the photo anyway.
Still, these guys are pros so I reckon I’ll keep trying until I get it right. The photos aren’t a total loss, I can still upload them to Flickr and post them here where other like minded people can enjoy them.
I’ve heard of lots of people manipulating their photos, and in a way it seems like cheating, but I guess that’s always been done as much as possible. I still liked it, though.
Mitch recently posted..Images Used By Permission & Copyright Laws – Guest Post
Good to know I got at least one fan

Yeah but wouldn’t it be nice to have a paying fan?

Mitch recently posted..Do I Know Social Media Marketing
Yeah, that it would
There is so much over manipulation in photography. When I first started shooting film photography, photo retouching was very limited and took some work to do. Now, everyone shoots digital, fires up Photoshop, and manipulates the photo so much, that the final image looks nothing like the original.
Of course there are exceptions, and the final application of the picture really determines for myself how much manipulation to apply. If I am entering a photo contest, then I will keep it very basic – brightness/contrast, color correction. If I am working on an advertisement, then I will apply as much manipulation as I see fit to convey the message.
Sire – I am with Mitch on this one, I like your photo as well. Photography is very subjective. Keep shooting, and don’t worry if one person doesn’t like your photo. For every person that doesn’t like it, there are probably 100 that do. They just don’t happen to be in charge of submissions to Dreamstime!
If you do want to do some retouching, there is GIMP, which is a free Photoshop alternative.
I look forward to seeing more of your work!
Ryan recently posted..My Breakdown of the Web Design Process
Thanks Ryan, and don’t worry, I don’t take it personally, it just makes me try harder to achieve what is required.
I just bought photoshop for $110 off eBay. I think that is pretty good. I’ll check it out but I don’t think I will try too much manipulation of the photo though. Too bad I didn’t see your comment earlier
Sire,
I am impressed with the knowledge you have! And I can honestly say I don’t even have an opinion about the photos! Everyone online probably realizes the changes that can be made with the pictues we look at and enjoys them for what they are :)
~Linda
Linda G. Cox recently posted..Keep On Keeping On with Multiple Sclerosis- Walking Update- August 1- 2010
“Enjoys them for what they are”, I think that is all a photographer can hope for. Thanks Linda.
Your light varies. On the right, the “stadium” is very strong lighting whereas the light on the left is not as strong. If you were close to the left, it would have given a more balanced light. Just a thought. However, overall is like it.
Actually I liked the effect. I admit that removing the convention center would change the way the photo looks and I may try that the next time I’m in the area. Thanks for the suggestion Greg.
These pros do have ‘rules’ and whatever. But sometimes these same rules would seem to limit some of their output. This, I believe, is the reason why some artists get recognized only after they’re long gone. The works of Rembrandt and other great artists were not that appreciated in their time because of the ‘rules’ that their ‘experts’ at the time imposed on them.
Last month, I got to see a ‘professional’photography exhibit at the mall. I honestly got turned off by most of their work. The pictures have become just too refined and too perfect, they look artificial and un-natural. I think, a few decades from now, all those pictures that were rejected by the experts will see their glory days.
James Moralde recently posted..How I Got Wireless Internet For My Laptop At Home
Good point James. I just had another one rejected and they said I should photoshop it to bring the colors out. I’m not going to do that because I don’t see the point as the colors are true to life.
I’ll just keep submitting them until one is accepted for what it is.
Their reply seems a little harsh, doesn’t it? I would think that the exact message could have been conveyed in substantially different – and nicer – language.
No, I don’t think they were being harsh. No point sugar coating it if the photo doesn’t meet up to their standards.
I think that’s the problem in this day and age is that people have such different likes and dislikes when it comes to artistic integrity. I think it’s what makes life super challenging for us photographers. I still like the effect overall myself.
Kevin recently posted..Rain Rain please don’t go away – Wedding Photography with Flare!
For me, the end result is all that matters. If I like the look of a photograph and it makes me happy, I dont care if it has been edited or created using photoshop.
That is an awesome picture fella, its come out really well. I really like the reflection in the water – you were lucky to be there on such a calm day!
You could try leveling the horizon and cropping into a panoramic. level horizons have better chances of approval.
DreamsTime is a great website, I remember using it for my blog a while ago too. I got some really nice stock images of which I was very proud at that particular moment.
Amit recently posted..Finding Forklift Training And Certification For Free